{
  "id": "case_ny_graham_v_dunkley",
  "version": 2,
  "jurisdiction": "us-ny",
  "domain": "torts.motor_vehicle",
  "title": "Graham v Dunkley, 50 AD3d 55 (2d Dept 2008)",
  "valid_from": null,
  "valid_to": null,
  "temporal_notes": [],
  "topics": [
    "rental_vehicle",
    "owner_liability"
  ],
  "status": "VERIFIED",
  "verification": {
    "verified_on": "2026-09-30",
    "methods": [
      "Quoted passages compared word for word with the opinion text on CourtListener (cluster 5891633), fetched through its API on 2026-09-30; citations inside passages are replaced by ellipses.",
      "Citation 50 AD3d 55 resolves to this cluster through CourtListener's citation lookup; case name matches. Decision date (February 1, 2008) and slip opinion number read from the official reporter header as captured by a search engine; nycourts.gov refuses automated requests from this environment."
    ],
    "human_review_status": "reviewed",
    "reviewer": null
  },
  "revisions": [
    {
      "version": 2,
      "date": "2026-10-25",
      "summary": "Reviewed for source and accuracy."
    }
  ],
  "name": "Graham v Dunkley",
  "citation": "50 AD3d 55",
  "parallel_citations": [
    "2008 NY Slip Op 00958"
  ],
  "court": "Appellate Division, Second Department",
  "court_level": "intermediate_appellate",
  "decided": "2008-02-01",
  "official_url": "https://nycourts.gov/REPORTER/3dseries/2008/2008_00958.htm",
  "courtlistener": null,
  "editor_summary": "Held that the federal Graves Amendment (49 USC § 30106) is a valid exercise of Congress's commerce power and bars a claim against a vehicle lessor based solely on vicarious liability under VTL § 388. The accident was a two-car collision in Queens.",
  "passages": [
    {
      "source": "src_courtlistener_graham_v_dunkley",
      "locator": "50 AD3d at 58",
      "text": "The section applies to all actions commenced on or after August 10, 2005 ... and has been enforced as preempting the vicarious liability imposed on commercial lessors by Vehicle and Traffic Law § 388"
    },
    {
      "source": "src_courtlistener_graham_v_dunkley",
      "locator": "50 AD3d at 58",
      "text": "We agree with the weight of precedent that the Graves Amendment was a constitutional exercise of congressional power pursuant to the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution."
    }
  ],
  "type": "case",
  "source_ids": [
    "src_courtlistener_graham_v_dunkley"
  ],
  "relationship_ids": [
    "rel_graham_supports_graves",
    "rel_graham_interprets_usc_30106"
  ],
  "url": "https://agents.newyorkeverydaylawreference.com/case/case_ny_graham_v_dunkley",
  "cite_as": {
    "id": "case_ny_graham_v_dunkley",
    "type": "case",
    "version": 2,
    "url": "https://agents.newyorkeverydaylawreference.com/case/case_ny_graham_v_dunkley",
    "content_hash": "sha256:cf46696b19f0f6f145f4ab4abb68f82c9afa31ff1f9e674e1fec41d26845a85c",
    "dataset_version": "2026.10.25",
    "citation": "Graham v Dunkley, 50 AD3d 55"
  },
  "trust": {
    "authority_level": "intermediate_appellate",
    "source_type": "courtlistener",
    "primary_source": false,
    "verified": true,
    "verification_date": "2026-09-30",
    "source_freshness": "2026-09-30",
    "temporal_status": "current",
    "conflict_status": "none_known",
    "human_review_status": "reviewed",
    "provenance_complete": true
  },
  "applicability": {
    "as_of": "2026-11-04",
    "applies": true,
    "temporal_status": "current",
    "reason": "Decided 2008-02-01.",
    "status": "VERIFIED"
  },
  "graph": {
    "outgoing": [
      {
        "id": "rel_graham_interprets_usc_30106",
        "relation": "interprets",
        "to": "auth_us_usc_49_30106"
      },
      {
        "id": "rel_graham_supports_graves",
        "relation": "supports",
        "to": "prop_us_mv_graves_rental_owner"
      }
    ],
    "incoming": []
  },
  "provenance": {
    "passages": [
      {
        "source": "src_courtlistener_graham_v_dunkley",
        "locator": "50 AD3d at 58",
        "sha256": "sha256:e376602a72d4182bf6f6b6c56359980948792f2b613fbcf562a2ff71a87f823c",
        "source_url": "https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5891633/graham-v-dunkley/",
        "retrieved": "2026-09-30"
      },
      {
        "source": "src_courtlistener_graham_v_dunkley",
        "locator": "50 AD3d at 58",
        "sha256": "sha256:88b451e2c9e5c274153638de3a212c064e2afe67f21acb500a0843c4d4c4b37c",
        "source_url": "https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/5891633/graham-v-dunkley/",
        "retrieved": "2026-09-30"
      }
    ]
  },
  "links": {
    "html": "https://agents.newyorkeverydaylawreference.com/case/case_ny_graham_v_dunkley",
    "json": "https://agents.newyorkeverydaylawreference.com/case/case_ny_graham_v_dunkley.json",
    "markdown": "https://agents.newyorkeverydaylawreference.com/case/case_ny_graham_v_dunkley.md",
    "current": "https://agents.newyorkeverydaylawreference.com/case/case_ny_graham_v_dunkley",
    "versions": [
      "https://agents.newyorkeverydaylawreference.com/case/case_ny_graham_v_dunkley/v/1",
      "https://agents.newyorkeverydaylawreference.com/case/case_ny_graham_v_dunkley/v/2"
    ],
    "schema": "https://agents.newyorkeverydaylawreference.com/schema/case.json"
  }
}